eBangor

The case for subphonemic attenuation in inner speech: Comment on Corley, Brocklehurst, and Moat (2011)

Oppenheim, G.M. (2012) The case for subphonemic attenuation in inner speech: Comment on Corley, Brocklehurst, and Moat (2011). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38 ((2)). pp. 502-512. DOI: 10.1037/a0025257

Full-text not available from this repository..

Abstract

Corley, Brocklehurst, and Moat (2011) recently demonstrated a phonemic similarity effect for phono- logical errors in inner speech, claiming that it contradicted Oppenheim and Dell�s (2008) characterization of inner speech as lacking subphonemic detail (e.g., features). However, finding an effect in both inner and overt speech is not the same as finding equal effects in inner and overt speech. In this response, I demonstrate that Corley et al.�s data are entirely consistent with the notion that inner speech lacks subphonemic detail and that each of their experiments exhibits a Similarity x Articulation interaction of about the same size that Oppenheim and Dell (2008, 2010) reported in their work. I further show that the major discrepancy between the labs� data lies primarily in the magnitude of the main effect of phonemic similarity and the overall efficiency of error elicitation and demonstrate that greater similarity effects are associated with lower error rates. This leads to the conclusion that successful speech error research requires finding a sweet spot between "too much randomness" and "too little data."

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Language & Linguistics Psychology, Experimental
Subjects: Research Publications
Departments: College of Health and Behavioural Sciences > School of Psychology
Date Deposited: 09 Dec 2014 16:55
Last Modified: 23 Sep 2015 03:15
ISSN: 0278-7393
URI: http://e.bangor.ac.uk/id/eprint/1446
Identification Number: DOI: 10.1037/a0025257
Administer Item Administer Item

eBangor is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.